Glad you asked. I like them both, but Harry has a simple, conversational tone, and is more “real world” and “down to earth” than Buzan. Buzan talks more about the theory, and includes a lot of interesting things that Lorayne doesn’t, but for “getting it” and using it, I’d go with Lorayne first.

How does the Harry Lorayne book and methods compare to Tony Buzan. He has some wonderful methods and ideas.

Linette Low